Archive
February, 2012 Monthly archive

In light of tonight’s Academy Awards ceremony, here is a review of an Academy Award winning film from an earlier competition. It should serve as a reminder that the 94% white, 77% male Academy, 86% of whom are over 50 years old, are in no way tethered to reality.

The Blind Side, racism, and money as the solution to everything.

Overflowing with stereotypes and racist assumptions, The Blind Side is a recent film with Academy Award recognition to spew forth derogatory ideals. It recycles the plot of Douglas Sirk’s Imitation of Life (another academy award nominated film) wherein a sympathetic white lady ‘saves’ and adopts an impoverished black person into a position of economic dependence.

In the case of Imitation of Life, an aspiring white movie starlet saves a black mother and her daughter by employing the mother as a maid. In The Blind Side, Michael ‘Big Mike’ Oher (Quinton Aaron) is ‘saved’ by the unwavering generosity of an unreasonably wealthy suburban housewife named Leigh Anne Tuohy (Sandra Bullock).

Click to Keep Reading . . .

Above: Tom Cruise stars as Brian Flanagan in Cocktail.

TL;DR Version
Applying a Marxist lens to Cocktail, this essay underlines the contradictions inherent in post-Reagan “populist” conservatism and demonstrates how this ideology simultaneously celebrates and belittles the working class. Spoilers abound.

Workers and Hustlers
by Matt Gardner

The reactionary turn of U.S. politics embodied in the Reagan administration had an indelible impact on American popular culture, both in the 1980s and the decades that followed. As David Sirota argued in his book Back to Our Future, contemporary historiography blamed the unrest of the Sixties on the supposed liberal excesses of hippies and the counterculture, the antiwar movement, black civil rights activists, and the welfare state. These were to be remedied by a strong dose of conservatism, aiming to resurrect a mythical version of the Fifties. The New Right celebrated so-called traditional American values: patriotism, militarism, Christianity, the family, and – most importantly – free enterprise.

Click to Keep Reading . . .

Above: The Recording Industry Association of America is comprised of the world’s biggest record labels.

TL;DR Version:
Musician and recording engineer Steve Albini lays his teeth into the music recording industry in his now famous rant “The Problem With Music”. Originally published in The Baffler in 1993, the article breaks down the expenses and income of an up-and-coming band signed to a major record label, and demonstrates how industry contracts are designed to rob musical talent in favour of superflous managerial types – “producers,” “distributors,” etc. Written in 1993, the numbers Albini provides are long outdated – the contract type, however, is still standard within both the recording industry and the film industry. In the wake of SOPA, PIPA, ACTA, and other invasive copyright initiatives, Albini’s argument is another nail in the coffin of dying, money-hungry entertainment giants: piracy only robs those who rob the producers of culture.

The Problem With Music
by Steve Albini

Whenever I talk to a band who are about to sign with a major label, I always end up thinking of them in a particular context. I imagine a trench, about four feet wide and five feet deep, maybe sixty yards long, filled with runny, decaying shit. I imagine these people, some of them good friends, some of them barely acquaintances, at one end of this trench. I also imagine a faceless industry lackey at the other end, holding a fountain pen and a contract waiting to be signed.

Nobody can see what’s printed on the contract. It’s too far away, and besides, the shit stench is making everybody’s eyes water. The lackey shouts to everybody that the first one to swim the trench gets to sign the contract. Everybody dives in the trench and they struggle furiously to get to the other end. Two people arrive simultaneously and begin wrestling furiously, clawing each other and dunking each other under the shit. Eventually, one of them capitulates, and there’s only one contestant left. He reaches for the pen, but the Lackey says, “Actually, I think you need a little more development. Swim it again, please. Backstroke.”

And he does, of course.

Click to Keep Reading . . .

Above: Thot Bot.

Blob Ford

Above: Blob Ford.

More photos of Toronto street art and public interventions after the break.

Click to Keep Reading . . .

Gabriella Coleman, Wolfe Chair in Scientific and Technological Literacy at McGill University and NYU prof in the department of Media, Culture, and Communication, has written an article about anonymous for the 15th issue of Triple Canopy.  She’s considered the leading anthropological expert on 4chan (thanks academia) and the article, Our Weirdness Is Free, is good, insightful, long, and worth it.

Consider:

“If one term embodies the paradoxical and contradictory character of Anonymous—which is now serious in action and frivolous by design; made up of committed activists and agents of mischief—it is lulz. These four letters denote the pleasures attained from generating and sharing jokes and memes such as LOLcats and the cartoon pedophile mascot Pedobear. But they also suggest how easily and casually trolls can violently undermine the sense of security enjoyed by carefree denizens of the “real world” by, for instance, ordering scores of unpaid pizzas to be delivered to a single address, or publishing one’s phone number and private communications and credit-card numbers and hard-drive contents and any other information one might think to be “personal” or secure. Perhaps most important, lulz-oriented actions puncture the consensus around our politics and ethics, our social lives, our aesthetic sensibilities, the inviolability of the world as it is; trolls invalidate that world by gesturing toward the possibility for Internet geeks to destroy it—to pull the carpet from under us—whenever they feel the urge and without warning.”

Maybe the Golden Age of Media Criticism is Now!

Click to Keep Reading . . .