Archive
American Politics

Above: Tom Cruise stars as Brian Flanagan in Cocktail.

TL;DR Version
Applying a Marxist lens to Cocktail, this essay underlines the contradictions inherent in post-Reagan “populist” conservatism and demonstrates how this ideology simultaneously celebrates and belittles the working class. Spoilers abound.

Workers and Hustlers
by Matt Gardner

The reactionary turn of U.S. politics embodied in the Reagan administration had an indelible impact on American popular culture, both in the 1980s and the decades that followed. As David Sirota argued in his book Back to Our Future, contemporary historiography blamed the unrest of the Sixties on the supposed liberal excesses of hippies and the counterculture, the antiwar movement, black civil rights activists, and the welfare state. These were to be remedied by a strong dose of conservatism, aiming to resurrect a mythical version of the Fifties. The New Right celebrated so-called traditional American values: patriotism, militarism, Christianity, the family, and – most importantly – free enterprise.

Click to Keep Reading . . .

We’re joining Google, Reddit, and Wikipedia in blacking out tomorrow in an internet-wide strike against SOPA.

Learn more about the strike, including a long list of participants.

Read the run through of what SOPA’s passing would entail, because even the Globe and Mail knows it’s bad.

Click to Keep Reading . . .

An ironic protest has hit the streets of New York, wearing the suits of Wall Street and speaking its language. Blending in and mingling with Wall-Streeters, ignoring anyone who reveals that they aren’t an investment banker, and using an iPad as a protest sign, the #occupyoccupywallstreet protesters are forcing financial sector employees to confront their own ideology head on. This is a protest for the status quo, one which asserts that “all the money” in America rightfully belongs to the 1%.

Click to Keep Reading . . .

Above: This political debate will entertain you beyond what is reasonable.

In what John Stewart aptly labeled an “Amerigasm,” the first-ever Tea Party Republican Presidential Debate has refined the science of TV democracy. CNN, on Tea Party Express buck, has done away with standard TV debate form. Incorporating elements of reality TV, particularly in its many introduction sequences, the debate swaps political discourse for high-octane entertainment.

Packed into this TV extravaganza was an extended performance of the star-spangled banner, a red-white-and-blue, star-covered arena of democracy (assembled for the occasion), a radically conservative crowd, and eight All-American potential presidents. Only the word “politics” displayed meaninglessly behind the candidates, or the occasional interjection from Ron Paul, remind us that this game show is somehow more important than all others.

Click to Keep Reading . . .

Ted Nugent brandishes a bow and arrowAbove: Ted Nugent aims to slay millennial apathy.

TL;DR Version:
The Tea Party has the right anger in the wrong place.  Ted Nugent writes an op-ed.  Millennials say “TL;DR”

Getting stoned on the American Dream
by Sarah Friend

Apparently, some guy named Ted Nugent has written an op-ed condemning the political apathy of “millennials”.  Since these kinds of age-based generalizations have always seemed like a load of pseudoscientific hoopla to me (rankable one step above astrology) I had to look it up: Millennials, I’m told, were born between 1976 and 2000.  Other sources say 1982 and 2000.  See what I mean about hoopla?

But, as I’m a millennial by either count and a person concerned about political apathy, I thought I’d better read the article.  Nugent writes that he remembers the ‘60’s, (whatever that means) but at the time he was politically disengaged himself, either “squirrel hunting or putting a sharp edge on [his] sonic guitar-slaying skills.”  He then uses the phrase “purple haze of dope” and eventually gets to his point:

“While I personally condemn violence of any kind, I am stunned that [the millennials] are not participating more in the Tea Party, even rioting in the streets, clashing with the cops, conducting sit-ins at their colleges, interrupting political events and so on. Instead, the young people of this generation appear to be sound asleep, lethargic and seemingly unaware of how badly their generation is being royally abused by the deep-seated corruption and abuse of power in the government. They appear to be terminally stoned on apathy.”

Click to Keep Reading . . .

Call of Duty Black Ops fans awaiting their propaganda purchaseAbove: Eager fans await their opportunity to plunk down $69.99 each for a copy of Call of Duty: Black Ops – image from Wiredcontroller.com

TL;DR Version:
Call of Duty is really fucked up. It teaches that America can and should torture people (including its own soldiers) and that terrorism is OK if performed by the US army. Call of Duty masks the reality of American imperialism and replaces it with a myth of American self-defense, purporting that all countries other than America are evil and hate freedom. It is the crack cocaine of American propaganda: incredibly addictive and a key player in a multi-billion dollar industry.

War In Your Living Room
by Michael Toledano

In the first 24 hours after its release, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 sold 4.7 million copies and collected $310 million dollars in revenue, becoming the single biggest entertainment launch in history. Its sequel, Black Ops, sold 7 million copies the day it was launched and easily shattered the earlier record. Black Ops, an unstoppable entertainment behemoth, made $1 billion in a mere six weeks (Modern Warfare 2 also eventually topped $1 billion, but took longer to do so) and currently stands as the best selling game of all time.

Critical reviews, for both games, were overwhelmingly positive – the games offer a polished and immersive war experience with unparalleled production value. In Black Ops, the voices of an all-star cast (including Sam Worthington, Ed Harris, Gary Oldman and Ice Cube) are combined with an original score by Hans Zimmer and licensed music from the Rolling Stones. The familiar experience of a Hollywood war epic is seamlessly combined with an absorptive first person shooter – the drama, intensity, star-power, and frequent large-scale explosions of a film like Black Hawk Down are perfectly translated into videogame form. Appropriately, Black Ops was launched alongside a big-budget TV spot, complete with the sellable faces of Kobe Bryant and Jimmy Kimmel.

Together, these games push the same Neo-Conservative agenda as Kiefer Sutherland’s 24 – they promote torture, unwavering and unthinking patriotism, expansionistic foreign policy, and the belief that terrorism is a real, omnipresent, and immediate threat to all Americans (it is, of course, not). But, unlike 24, which viewers engage with passively, the Call of Duty games are interactive and experiential. They are immersive, addictive, and incredibly fun – as an ideological vessel, Modern Warfare 2 may well be the most effective tool of indoctrination to date.

Click to Keep Reading . . .